ATLANTA — It turns out this year's flu shot is doing a startlingly dismal job of protecting older people, the most vulnerable age group.
The vaccine is proving only 9 percent effective in those 65 and older against the harsh strain of the flu that is predominant this season, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday.
Health officials are baffled as to why this is so. But the findings help explain why so many older people have been hospitalized with the flu this year.
Despite the findings, the CDC stood by its recommendation that everyone over 6 months get flu shots, the elderly included, because some protection is better than none, and because those who are vaccinated and still get sick may suffer less severe symptoms.
"Year in and year out, the vaccine is the best protection we have," said CDC flu expert Dr. Joseph Bresee.
Overall, across the age groups studied, the vaccine's effectiveness was found to be a moderate 56 percent, which means those who got a shot have a 56 percent lower chance of winding up at the doctor with the flu. That is somewhat worse than what has been seen in other years.
For those 65 and older, the vaccine was only 27 percent effective against the three strains it is designed to protect against, the worst level in about a decade. It did a particularly poor job against the tough strain that is causing more than three-quarters of the illnesses this year.
It is well known that flu vaccine tends to protect younger people better than older ones. Elderly people have weaker immune systems that don't respond as well to flu shots, and they are more vulnerable to the illness and its complications, including pneumonia.
But health officials said they don't know why this year's vaccine did so poorly in that age group.
One theory, as yet unproven, is that older people's immune systems were accustomed to strains from the last two years and had more trouble switching gears to handle this year's different, harsh strain.
The preliminary data for senior citizens is less than definitive. It is based on fewer than 300 people scattered among five states.
But it will no doubt surprise many people that the effectiveness is that low, said Michael Osterholm, a University of Minnesota infectious-disease expert who has tried to draw attention to the need for a more effective flu vaccine.
Among infectious diseases, flu is considered one of the nation's leading killers. On average, about 24,000 Americans die each flu season, according to the CDC.
This flu season started in early December, a month earlier than usual, and peaked by the end of year. Hospitalization rates for people 65 and older have been some of the highest in a decade, at 146 per 100,000 people.
Flu viruses tend to mutate more quickly than others, so a new vaccine is formulated each year to target the strains expected to be the major threats. CDC officials have said that in formulating this year's vaccine, scientists accurately anticipated the strains that are circulating this season.
Because of the guesswork involved, scientists tend to set a lower bar for flu vaccine. While childhood vaccines against diseases like measles are expected to be 90 or 95 percent effective, a flu vaccine that's 60 to 70 percent effective in the U.S. is considered pretty good. By that standard, this year's vaccine is OK.
For senior citizens, a flu vaccine is considered pretty good if it's in the 30 to 40 percent range, said Dr. Arnold Monto, a University of Michigan flu expert.
A high-dose version of the flu shot was recently made available for those 65 and older, but the new study was too small to show whether that has made a difference.
The CDC estimates are based on about 2,700 people who got sick in December and January. The researchers traced back to see who had gotten shots and who hadn't. An earlier, smaller study put the vaccine's overall effectiveness at 62 percent, but other factors that might have influenced that figure weren't taken into account.
The CDC's Bresee said there is a danger in providing preliminary results because it may result in people doubting — or skipping — flu shots. But the figures were released to warn older people who got shots that they may still get sick and shouldn't ignore any serious flu-like symptoms, he said.





















Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 12
Beachglow writes:
I have never had a flu shot because as in most things in life I think a lot of these "you must" situations put out there, this is just a money-maker for the medical profession or in some cases, pharmacies. Strains of the flu are different every year and they can't keep up with the changes. So it's really a waste of money.
I've never had the flu.
anotherPOV writes:
"foreign doctors who can't even hardly speak English"
Why are so many racist so stupid?
ex31539er writes:
A government program ineffective? Who would have thought?
No knock on the Flu Shot program or on the CDC, but why do we place any trust in government when it proves again and again everyday that its best efforts are ineffective?
Even worse, why do we continually invite government to take ever-increasing power and authority over our lives?
Government ineffectiveness (not to mention government graft, corruption, criminality, and gross incompetence) is a congenital defect of government.
Government had such a bad reputation among the Founders that they tried forever to attenuate the Beast at its birth.
Too bad the Founders' heirs aren't so discerning to recognize Greeks in the Trojan Horse that is perennial promises of "stuff the government's gonna do for us."
John_Galt writes:
Flu Shots are a scam. Google ingredients in flu shots. You'll be disgusted. Did you also know that it says right on the box that no studies have ever proven the efficacy of the flu shot? No wonder they don't let you see the packaging.
One study showed that Vitamin D was 800% more effective than the flu shot.
Unlike other vaccines, mercury (thimerosal) has never been removed from the flu shot. That's not to say I believe it causes autism - but do you really want mercury injected into your body in any dose? Some of the other ingredients are just as bad.
Follow the money. Pharmaceutical companies are making a ton of money off these shots. Guess who the biggest advertisers are on every major network? Now you also know why the news won't report fairly on this.
ex31539er writes:
Are you intentionally debasing the very serious concept of racism by your own inarticulate charge of "racist" while criticizing the moderately inarticulate, but eminently reasonable, complaint that foreign doctors often don't speak English very well?
lemonjello writes:
Racist people are idiots. Just like you.
babbas writes:
I have never had a flu shot and haven't had the flu in about 18 years. At 41 years of age, I have researched topics such as building your immune system through eating certain foods and exercising. They work.
I also have done my own research on the flu shot. I was under the impression, contrary to the information in this article, that the flu shot was intended to counter only ONE particular strain of the flu virus. This particular strain is determined each year by scientists that think it will be the most prevalent of the thousands of strains out there!
This is a total scam, folks. Build your immune systems and stop using Purell on your fingers! Purell kills the good bacteria on your fingers, which are there to ward off harmful bacteria and viruses. Essentially, you are weakening your immune system each time you use Purell or the like.
This information is given to you free of charge, unlike "professional" advice.
You're welcome.
DawnPharmer writes:
Yes...all medicine is bunk, you need to see shamans or practitioners of voodoo or magic to keep you healthy. Drink only vinegar, eat only clay, sand and air. Spin like a Dervish and wash yourself only when it rains.
The evil BigPharma, MedicalPactictioners and any and all licensed educated individuals who have studied years using that sham concept of science are never to be trusted. They are NOT perfect, they don't know everything even though they are always trying to learn more. ONLY ancient concepts are right...exposure yourself to every disease possible to "build your system", yep...go for it.
The more of you who deny science, accept the old ways the better for the fools who accept what years of research has led to...But you will have the last laugh as you will not need to think about growing older and older. Just think you can actually reduce the average life span and because you will go to your reward earlier, you will reduce your chances of getting some types of diseases associated with long life! HUZZAH for the return to the days of non-science. You can help usher in the Age of Nonsense. Alternative pathways to living via positive thought, shunning of science, adoption of homeopathy, ear candling and oh so much more. Such fun, so much like the ancients who as we know were oh so healthy. But please, please be aware of one very common poison: monohydrogen dioxide...it can kill you. It is intrusive, used in foods and industry, too.
babbas writes:
Do you feel better after your rant about stereotypes?
When that side effect of your "meds" pops up, the answer is - another med. Pathetic.
Science and medicine in a capitalistic society should not be the ultimate source for knowledge when it comes to caring for oneself. They may be a complimentary source, but not the only source.
Klaatu writes:
Got first and only flu about 20-25 yrs ago got the flu from it !
Since then no more flu shots haven't had the flu since.
Never again
meeho42794 writes:
maybe because flu shots are baloney?
Mohammed_Goldberg writes:
An analogy about flu shots is like a key in a lock. The key has to be the correct one or the lock will not open. The flu shot has to be the exact match for the flu virus os it will not work properly. Saying is is close and may be partially effective seems to be a way to get people to purchase the shot and limit the losses from the purchase of the vaccine.
Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.