proof of Democrat voter fraud

Council for Constitutional Principles

Concerning states asking for a photo ID to prove eligibility to vote. Democrats insist that voting fraud is a “made up problem”
All below comes from the internet. My remarks are within quotes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho6Y2dHy-bM&feature=player_embedded
Everyone could see it right in front of them on live television. Florida Democrat gubernatorial candidate Alex Sink was caught red-handed cheating in a debate. Her excuse? She blamed her Republican opponent (i.e., “blame Bush!).
Corrupt Democrat voter machine ACORN never truly dies. It just changes its name.
In previous elections, any race that was close would be stolen from Republicans by Democrat cheating. As Al Franken being elected on the illegally-cast votes of incarcerated convicts serves to demonstrate.
There are the strange goings-ons inside the voting machines in Nevada, which have a mysterious tendency to prompt voters to select Harry Reid.
SEIU pro-Democrat voter-stuffing shenanigans, with clear evidence of massive fraud.
“When I was a member of the SEIU I went into voting machine to vote for our reprentatives.
When I entered the voting booth and closed the curtain behind me a Rep came in and told me who to vote for. I told him to take a walk. Later that day a union rep came and asked me if I wanted to go to shop steward school. “
Add to that the 250 absentee ballots the Republican candidate tracked to a vacant lot
Add to that an Ohio public high school that bussed students during school hours to vote after being given a ballot that ONLY had Democrats on it. After which they were treated to ice cream.
Add to that the evidence in Bucks County, Pennsylvania that the Democrat candidate is flooding the voter registration office with fraudulent applications for absentee ballots.
Add to that voting machines in North Carolina which are “voting” for Democrats even when that is the exact opposite of what voters intend. Which is simply the icing on the cake of all kinds of other fraud going on there.
Add to that still more corrupt Democrats in Pennsylvania who created a fictitious “Pennsylvania Voter Assistance Office” to commit voter fraud.
Add to that a public state university in Wisconsin that illegally urged students and faculty to get out and help the Democrat cause.
Add to that a woman who is literally under criminal indictment for past voter fraud with liberal A.C.O.R.N. now heading up yet another corrupt liberal voter fraud group.
Add to that Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer both illegally and immorally requesting public high school teachers to send public school kids to volunteer for her campaign.
a Democrat organization in Virginia “shocked” that their free beer in exchange for votes was actually criminal.
the woman named Gabby Mercer with the Republican “Jan Brewer for Governor” sign painted on the rear window of her car getting a big rock thrown through that window in a clear act of political intimidation.
Democrat Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee committing voter fraud at a polling place.
First Lady Michelle Obama, who had committed voter fraud in the same way.
to that forged ballots and illegals registering to vote for Democrats via groups such as Mi Familia Vota, Border Action, and Faith.Hope.Vote! Which all have ties to the SEIU.
a staffer for a long-time Arizona Democrat who was caught stealing the yard signs featuring his Republican opponent (see also here for the KGUN 9 story, at least until they delete it).
illegal immigrants who are actively working to undermine the vote in Washington State for Democrats. Even as liberal Democrat bastions such as San Fransisco are currently seeking to undermine the sanctity of citizens and the vote altogether.
Democrat states such as New York and Illinois disenfranchising military service members – who vote heavily Republican – of the right to vote in violation of the law.
campaign ads by Democrat candidates such as Rep. Alan Grayson which so shockingly and deliberately misrepresent the truth that even MSNBC are taking them to the woodshed for their gross lies.

There is more but I think the above should be enough.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 17

jr18 writes:

I'm not sure what planet you came from but you are either crazy or dangerously misinformed. The Democratic Party has good candidates and a sound platform of humane and intelligent policies to run on . The only cheaters I know of are those who "pretend" corruption a la James O'Keefe and they are generally Republican right wingers.

Anti-Stupid61 writes:

Someone needs to make sure Tom takes his medication. Wow!

sally1860 writes:

tom only reports "news" as reported by FOXnoise. Therefore, while there might be some truth to some of all that cr*p, the dastardliness is magnified immensely. For instance, there is no evidence that "incarcerated convicts" elected Al Franken. During the long recount in that election, Republicans found a number of ballots with names and birthdates that matched people who had been convicted. However, no one ever said that a)these actually were all the same people b)they were in jail at the time they voted c)they all voted for Al Franken or d)they hadn't had their voting rights restored (possible for some in MN). IF all of those ballots were cast by actual illegally voting felons, and IF they ALL voted for Franken, it MIGHT have influenced his win. And none of that presumes that anybody organized this supposed fraud, much less that the Democratic Party or Franken himself did. The high-school kids who went to the polls in Ohio were shown sample ballots with Democrats on them, but that doesn't mean that in the voting booth the ballots weren't the same as everybody else's, and it doesn't mean that the students actually voted only for Democrats. Since they had to be over 18, surely they have sense enough to know for whom they want to vote, and are old enough to resist being bribed by ice cream treats.

And a rock through a car window, or stealing yard signs is evidence of fraud?? Come on, that's juvenile stuff carried out by individuals -- in both parties. And who ever decided who to vote for based on a yard sign anyway? Why don't you talk about the elections where robocalls have gone out to Democrats telling them the wrong dates for voting?

Macchia and Willoughby are WAY too paranoid, and have WAY too much time on their hands.

MacGumbo writes:

I spent the last few hours looking up and verifying what he published above and instead of just throwing out a blanket "liar" statement as many of you do, why don't you do the same? I couldn't find one false statement, can you?

MacGumbo writes:

BTW: Don't forget the self proclaimed "racist" black panther intimidation in Pittsburgh.

Imagine the outcry by those who say it was ok if just a single sign about white supremacy was posted at a voting spot. Serious, serious, hypocritical double standard.

TiredoftheBS writes:

Those opposing photo ID do it only for the ability to commit fraud.

What other reason could there be? Anyone?

willburgolf writes:

in response to MacGumbo:

I spent the last few hours looking up and verifying what he published above and instead of just throwing out a blanket "liar" statement as many of you do, why don't you do the same? I couldn't find one false statement, can you?

Yes and HE LIES and you back him!!!!!!
So you are as bad as he is!!

MacGumbo writes:

Do you want to post with links the "lies" or as usual just claim lies without proof?

cupcake writes:

This is nothing compared to the Florida Supreme court ruling in 2000.

Both sides lie, cheat, and steal. Both sides are bought and paid for by the very same people that will win whatever the outcome of a vote is.

sally1860 writes:

in response to TiredoftheBS:

Those opposing photo ID do it only for the ability to commit fraud.

What other reason could there be? Anyone?

It has nothing to do with being able to commit fraud. It has to do with voter access, and the laws that were passed decades ago that mandated equal access to the polls for ALL -- meaning the black, poor, and otherwise disenfranchised. Believe it not, there are people who do not have driver's licenses (no money for cars or gas), who don't have jobs, don't travel on airplanes or any other conveyance that would require licenses or IDs, and don't even have the money to get on busses to get themselves to the agencies which (with limited hours of business) will charge them (money that they don't have) for the privilege of having a basic ID. And now, if the Repubs get their way, even that will become more difficult, with requirements for birth certificates (some of these folks were born in their mother's bedrooms and never registered, and others don't have the money to pay for a copy from the state) and other documents that supposedly are necessary to prove their citizenship. And wonder of wonders, most of those poor and disenfranchised folks would vote Democratic if they can manage to get registered and/or make it to the polls -- remember, they have difficulties with transportation.

So tell me again why it is that opposing the regulations which obstruct the ability of the poor to vote is proof of intended fraud.

Writethinker writes:

More evidence of class warfare being practiced by the Republican Party and conservatives against the poor and middle class in this country. Also, evidence that the tea party types are not against governmental intrusion into our private lives, if it suits their purpose, making them no different than those they attack.

nstinks writes:

Isn't this precious?

Dumborats were calling for a national ID card and now they are against photo ID to prove elligibility for voting.

What could possibly be wrong with that............other than voter's fraud.........which Dmeocrats relish.

TiredoftheBS writes:

in response to sally1860:

It has nothing to do with being able to commit fraud. It has to do with voter access, and the laws that were passed decades ago that mandated equal access to the polls for ALL -- meaning the black, poor, and otherwise disenfranchised. Believe it not, there are people who do not have driver's licenses (no money for cars or gas), who don't have jobs, don't travel on airplanes or any other conveyance that would require licenses or IDs, and don't even have the money to get on busses to get themselves to the agencies which (with limited hours of business) will charge them (money that they don't have) for the privilege of having a basic ID. And now, if the Repubs get their way, even that will become more difficult, with requirements for birth certificates (some of these folks were born in their mother's bedrooms and never registered, and others don't have the money to pay for a copy from the state) and other documents that supposedly are necessary to prove their citizenship. And wonder of wonders, most of those poor and disenfranchised folks would vote Democratic if they can manage to get registered and/or make it to the polls -- remember, they have difficulties with transportation.

So tell me again why it is that opposing the regulations which obstruct the ability of the poor to vote is proof of intended fraud.

Because they can still get ID's, made at their home, FOR FREE!

The inner city folks and minorities have never shied away from free medical care so a record of birth isn't a problem.

The only people that might are the back woods people of the Appalachia area and they aren't the ones crying foul!

macchia writes:

in response to Writethinker:

More evidence of class warfare being practiced by the Republican Party and conservatives against the poor and middle class in this country. Also, evidence that the tea party types are not against governmental intrusion into our private lives, if it suits their purpose, making them no different than those they attack.

let me see if I can get this straight.
Republicans cater to the 1% and dis the 99%
If so - and it is not, Republicans expect to outvote the 99% with the 1% - give me a break.

Cassandra (Inactive) writes:

in response to MacGumbo:

I spent the last few hours looking up and verifying what he published above and instead of just throwing out a blanket "liar" statement as many of you do, why don't you do the same? I couldn't find one false statement, can you?

If this be true, and I doubt that it is, why don't you list the links where you found the gospel truth?

Cassandra (Inactive) writes:

I'm always fascinated by the contents of the entry statement on this blog and, from time to time, I've asked what most of them have to do with the Constitution.

It appears to be a local tea party pasttime to roam the internet, seize upon whatever items can be used to denigrate Democrats, liberals and anyone deemed to deviate from the antediluvian philosophy of tea party androids, and triumphantly proclaim "see, I told you so".

Anyone can perform this trick. I could remind the auther that a Republican Indiana State official was recently convicted of voter fraud, an event that will not find its way to this blog. There are plenty more similar snippets one could add to an anti- Republicam/conservative/tea party tirade if one wished.

If Macchia and company wish to discuss constitutional principles, they can have at it. As it is, they present themselves as mere gossop columnists.

TomEgelhoff writes:

Would The Huffington Post be a news source everyone might be happier with than Fox?? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01...

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features